The Construct incorporates the evolving understanding of the brain and how it processes information about reality. Neuroscience is an essential component of the Construct concept.
For information about the cost of violence, click on the button above.
A concept central shared between the The Integrative Power Management Model (IPM2), the Integrative Conflict Management Model (ICM2), and the Violence Integrative Prevention and Restoration (PAR) Model is the notion of "the construct." In a normal state of consciousness, human beings are not consciously aware of every piece of information coming from the reality they are in moment to moment. This reality is called the "universal field." We construct our experience of reality from this field. By reframing the construct about power, conflict, and violence through a cognitive approach, challenges such as excellence, conflict, and violence are seen in new ways — ones that differs significantly from the ineffective traditional approaches.
The construct is the experience of reality one creates by selecting information (almost always unconsciously) from the "universal field" (the totality of reality), filtering it through the "discriminator" (also called the "the lens ") and projecting the interpreted and associated information selection as "reality." This construct is commonly mistaken for complete reality, when in fact, it is a partial representation of total reality (the universal field).
The way in which we view, prevent, and respond to challenging human relationships is based upon the way in which we describe "the reality" of those relationships (e.g., a construct). The test of the validity of any construct is the congruency of that construct with the outcomes we want, whether its a better, more fulfilling life or an end to conflict and violence.
For example, the notion that violence is an unhealthy strategy to get power and control is generally accepted. While the strategy is often effective over the short term, it is rarely sustainable (ask anyone incarcerated for a violent crime how it worked for them). Since acts of violence have the desire for power and control as an antecedent, the PAR Model recognizes the value of achieving the power goal, but in a healthy, long-term way. This requires interrupting that part of the construct of a person with violence so that the power sought in the violent act is nullified and a healthy alternative is substituted (referred to in the Models as a "power swap").
This is achieved by introducing "disrupter memes" into the construct. The IPM2, the ICM2, and the PAR Model draw heavily upon memetic theory (originally described by Richard Dawkins in 1976 in The Selfish Gene – for an excellent summary, refer to the discussion by Anders Sandberg and others on the web). The model takes the position that existence must "make sense," i.e., be congruent. Without congruency, one has the experience of insanity. Therefore, all constructs have a structure that is congruent. This is true of constructs which include healthy behaviors such as excellence and cooperation as well as those in which conflict and violence are normative behaviors. The disrupter meme is a widely accepted and comprehendible concept which causes the unhealthy part of the construct to loose its congruency – that is, the malignant part of the construct collapses. A common example of this process is when one's hypocrisy is brought to light.
The following illustrates this process:
During an outdoor music concert, a belligerent biker approaches and says menacingly, "I can take your frigging head off [or words to that effect] . . . In fact, I think I'll do it right now." The person who is the object of his attention has been "mapping" the biker (interactive mapping is a process described by the PAR Model), and responds, "Take my head off? That's no achievement. Just about anyone can do that. Thank God there are people like you around so that, if I ever got a serious threat from someone about taking my head off, you could probably make sure it didn't happen. True?" The biker then responds, "Yeah, I could probably handle that." The discussion continues about how important it is to have someone powerful enough to stop violence at these music events.
The power of the threat is invalidated and a healthy power frame (via the "hero" meme) is immediately introduced (the "power swap"). The "hero" meme is the disrupter and initiates the power frame (choice, e.g. the question, "True?"). The biker achieves his goal of experiencing power and the object of his interest retains his head. [This example is based upon an actual incident.]
